Month: April 2007

CRS reports – action needed

~ admin

From Open the Government —

Policy and News Updates for March 20, 2007

[new] Accessing Congressional research
American taxpayers spend nearly $100 million a year to fund the Congressional Research Service (CRS), an arm of the Library of Congress whose 700 researchers provide reports to members of Congress on a variety of topics relevant to current political events. However, these reports are not open to the public. The best way for the public to obtain a CRS report is through their member of Congress, but the process is slow and it requires that the requester know the report exists.

On March 28, coalition partners of OpenTheGovernment.org, along with the Center for Democracy and Technology and others, sent a letter to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi [D-CA], the Senate Rules Committee, and the Committee on House Administration asking that CRS reports be made available to the public. According the letter, “Public demand for these reports has never been higher. In a little more than a year, members of the public have downloaded more than 3.5 million CRS reports from OpenCRS.com, a Web site that provides a searchable database of CRS reports that have been obtained by various archivists and members of the public.”

Making CRS reports available to the public makes sense. According to the letter, “CRS already maintains a fully searchable, password-protected Web site for members of Congress… Increasing capacity and providing public access to that site would constitute a trivial expense for the Library of Congress or for the House in light of their current levels of traffic.” As Paul M. Weyrich, Chairman and CEO of the Free Congress Foundation, notes in a commentary piece, “The proliferation of free information online has only strengthened the argument that CRS also should offer free information.”

Focus has turned to CRS recently, due to two memos CRS Director Daniel P. Mulhollan issued noting changes in CRS policies. On March 20, Mulhollan issued a memo to all CRS staff saying, “I have concluded that prior approval should now be required at the division or office level before products are distributed to members of the public. This policy is effective immediately.” In the past, it was possible for members of the press, other researchers, and other government officials to request specific reports from the congressional support agency. However, as Secrecy News reports, this memo changes that policy. A staffer told Secrecy News, “We’re all sort of shaking. I can’t do my work.”

In addition, some members of Congress have criticized CRS for its recent decision to stop its reports on earmarks. In a Wall Street Journal Editorial titled “Earmark Cover-Up”, John Fund accuses CRS of “helping its masters hide wasteful spending.” Despite requests from Sen. Coburn [R-OK] and Sen. Jim DeMint [R-SC], a private Feb. 22 directive from Director Mulhollan states that, “CRS will no longer identify earmarks for individual programs, activities, entities, or individuals,” ending its 12-year practice of reporting on earmark data. Mulhollan responded to the editorial in a memo to CRS staff and a letter to the editor, available through Secrecy News.

TAKE ACTION: Help add to the Open CRS collection! Call your member of Congress and request a PDF copy of the following CRS Report. Once you receive it, submit it to Open CRS.
Report Order Code: RL31686
Title: Demilitarization of Significant Military Equipment

Lots of news on government information

~ admin

3/28 PPD, p. 2C. In the National subsection, a story headlined “Research firm sues to see auto safety data”, is about a group that studies tire failures suing the U.S. Department of Transportation.

3/29 Strib, p. E4. in “News of the Weird”, the first item describes a website being operated in Finland that allows voters to match their physical appearance with the appearance of candidates so they can vote for people who look like them.

3/30 Strib. p. A10. Story, headlined “Soldiers’ VA cure hindered by lapses in use of digital medical data”.

3/30 Strib. p. A12. Story, headlined “Interior official altered reports, inspector says”, is about another instance of government reports being altered for political reasons. The story also describes release of confidential information to selected businesses.

3/30 PPD, p.1C. Story, headlined “Ridder’s clear break scuffed” includes allegations that the new publisher of the Strib took confidential data from the PPD.

3/30 PPD, p. 1A. Story, headlined “St. Paul candidates join You Tube nation”.

3/30 PPD, p. 7a. Story, headlined “Bush appointee altered species reports to benefit landowners”, is the same story as described above but with a more direct headline.

3/31 PPD, p. 2C. Story, headlined “Technology ‘xxx’ hits red light again”, is about defeat of a proposal to give pornography its own address on the web.

3/31 PPD, p. 1C. Story, headlined “Ridder says exit made in good faith”, continues the saga of what Rider took from St. Paul to Minneapolis on his laptop.

4/1 PPD, p. 3A. Story, headlined “Bush fills attorney post with insider” is based on analysis of the resumes of new U.S. attorneys.

4/1 Strib. p. A9. Story, headlined “Many prosecutors had inside track”, is the same as the Pioneer Press story mentioned above.

4/1 Strib. p. D1. Story, headlined “In a hurry for ultrafast Internet”, is about the City of Eagan looking for high speed internet for the entire city including the possibility of laying fiber citywide.

4/1 Strib. p. B1. Nick Coleman’s column, headlined “If Heffelfinger hadn’t quit would he have been purged”, is Coleman’s take, using public e-mails, on the local effect of the U.S. attorney fiasco.

4/2 Strib, p. A11. Story, headlined “From cabarets in Cyprus to drivers in Qatar, dangers abound for Americans abroad, the State Dept. warns”, is about a state department cataloging dangers of foreign travel, which is put up mostly for businesses, according to a spokesperson, but is available to anyone.

4/2 PPD, p. 2B. In the “Bulletin Board” feature is an item, headlined “Will the library let me borrow this book? It’s ‘TOO SOON TO TELL'”, is about a technology twist in libraries.